<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wendbaar.nl &#187; #formatting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wendbaar.nl/blog/tag/formatting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wendbaar.nl/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 20:56:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Prediction: &#8220;Twitter App Formatting Standards War&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://wendbaar.nl/blog/2010/01/prediction-twitter-app-formatting-standards-war/</link>
		<comments>http://wendbaar.nl/blog/2010/01/prediction-twitter-app-formatting-standards-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 13:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>berl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Speculation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#client]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#formatting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#TFS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#tweet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wendbaar.nl/blog/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well&#8230;, a war is a little bit exaggerated. But consistency is the issue here, which remembers me the early days of different implementations of webbrowsers (which is still a pain in the ass, ask any random webdeveloper)
For example, today I ran in to the formatting of an URL. In tweetdeck it&#8217;s only clickable when an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;, a war is a little bit exaggerated. But consistency is the issue here, which remembers me the early days of different implementations of webbrowsers (which is still a pain in the ass, ask any random webdeveloper)</p>
<p>For example, today I ran in to the formatting of an URL. In tweetdeck it&#8217;s only clickable when an URL has the protocol attached to it (http://). So I <a href="http://twitter.com/LeipeLeon/status/7516634199">complained about it</a>, thinking that people didn&#8217;t understand linking in tweets.</p>
<p>Turns out <a href="http://twitter.com/FiXato/status/7518432077">I was wrong</a>, apps like tweetie and the webinterface of twitter itself automagically create a hyperlink from an address prefixed with www without an http://.</p>
<p>So my question is, should there be a standard (like HTML/CSS) or developer guidline to format tweets (or is there one already?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wendbaar.nl/blog/2010/01/prediction-twitter-app-formatting-standards-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

